Developers work with SQL code, database tables, and their own application code. ... Technically no there isn't a standard for table naming conventions. The biggest reason why I prefer singular table names instead of plural table names when it comes to database table naming conventions is that it ensures consistency between all areas of your application. The following are the naming rules for DynamoDB: However, using prefixes on an object name not only wastes valuable characters, it also makes maintenance worse. We could use names user_has_role, or if we want to be shorter – user_role. Now, it’s a little less clear as to what that table means. c9 or imdb) should be lowercased (no numbers or special characters lie "_" or "-"). Is a table more like a class name? It’s easier for these developers to understand singular versions of words. When you delete and recreate this kind of index, it immediately follows one of the first two naming conventions. Although the naming convention is nowadays often used within the Microsoft Access community, and is the standard in Visual Basic programming, it is not widely used elsewhere.. The main difference between DB2 for i and other database management systems (DBMS) is that DB2 for i is integrated into the operating system. Is this a special case where you want a plural table name used? English is pretty weird. On the example of our 4 tables, it’s more than clear what data can be found in these tables. The pluralisation of words is an English language concept to help with speaking. If you apply best practices from the start and continue using them when you add new objects, you’ll keep your database structure well organized and easily readable. It’s one of the easier database table naming conventions to follow. And sometimes you’ll forget, and get an error. Let me know in the comments below. These are tables like employee, customer, city, and country. |   GDPR   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy. Foreign keys. Tables, attributes, and other objects in DynamoDB must have names. Each is better in some ways. The number of articles for each opinion shouldn’t matter. Regardless, the more systematically consistent the naming conventions become when defined, the more benefits will ultimately be seen within the development and implementation of your Data Vault solution. The convention I describe here suits me, as a developer. It might be tempting to save a few keystrokes and abbreviate your table names. Or more like an array? Many BI data sources will have long table names like fctSalesTransactionsHistory or dimCustomerMasterFile. Preferably give the table a single word noun description/name. A table is truly both. In case you have something specific for your database, you can list all such exceptions in one short document. Use the full words when naming tables. SQL Table Letter-casing Conventions. If you’ve seen examples of databases where a master and detail record is used, or even when you’ve created some yourself, you might have found it easier to understand to use singular names. Maybe you’ll even change the language used to write the code. I’ve documented these database conventions to be used with Oracle databases. The main point here is that you should be consistent. Consistently applying a convention for naming tables, queries, forms, reports, and the control objects in forms and reports, across all Access databases makes their creation and maintenance much easier than if you use any old names. This is a fairly opinionated post and I welcome feedback from people suggesting alternatives. Naming conventions contribute to consistency and to making the application easier to understand. Catalog 2. Therefore, you can expect that the database will stay, more or less, very similar to its’ initial production version. So, using underscores to separate words in SQL table names is easier to distinguish and will be stored as expected in the Oracle database. If possible, use a single word that exactly describes what is in the table. E.g., if we want all customers with 5 or more calls, I would call this procedure similar to this –. You should name them in such a manner that they uniquely and clearly describe what they are – which tables they relate. The information presented here serves as a guide for you to follow when naming your database objects.